Updated
Why I use ChatGPT
A blank page, an untidy document or a repeat admin task can take more time than the judgement that comes afterwards. I use ChatGPT to get that initial work moving sooner and produce something practical to review.
I chose it because it is broad enough to help with drafting, summarising, analysis and structured problem-solving. That means I do not need to add a specialist tool for every small job.
How it fits into my work
I use ChatGPT to structure proposals, create first drafts and summarise long material. I also use it to clean up messy data and create repeatable prompts for work that comes up regularly.
The important distinction is that I treat the output as a starting point. The useful part is having an early version that I can assess, correct and improve rather than expecting unedited output to be ready for use.
- Structuring proposals
- Creating first drafts
- Summarising long material
- Cleaning up messy data
- Building repeatable prompts
Its main strengths
ChatGPT creates momentum when the first version is difficult. It can turn a blank page or an untidy set of information into a structure that is easier to work with.
Its other strength is breadth. I can use one general-purpose tool across a wide range of business tasks, including repeatable prompts that provide a consistent starting point for regular work.
- Creates momentum at the start of a task
- Works across a broad set of business activities
- Provides structure for drafts and documents
- Creates useful starting points for repeatable prompts
Limitations and day-to-day frustrations
The clearest limitation is that ChatGPT can sound certain when it is wrong. A confident answer is not evidence that the answer is accurate, so its work still needs checking against the relevant information and context.
Unedited output can also sound generic. It may need substantial changes to reflect the right voice, subject knowledge and purpose. ChatGPT should not be expected to replace judgement, expertise or high-stakes checks.
- It can present incorrect information confidently
- Unedited writing can sound generic
- Outputs require human review
- It does not replace subject knowledge or judgement
Information policy matters
A business needs a clear rule for what information should not be entered into ChatGPT. That decision should be made before people start using the tool across routine work.
Its ability to help with long documents, messy data and repeat tasks does not remove the need to decide whether the underlying information is appropriate to enter. The tool is more useful when that boundary is understood.
- Set clear rules about information that must not be entered
- Apply those rules to documents, data and prompts
- Review how the tool is being used in repeat workflows
Who it suits and who should avoid it
ChatGPT suits owners and small teams looking for a general-purpose AI assistant. It is a practical option for people who want help with early drafts, summaries, data clean-up and repeatable prompts, and who are prepared to review the result.
It does not suit anyone expecting AI output to replace judgement, subject knowledge or high-stakes checks. If there is no time or expertise available to review the work, it is the wrong approach for that task.
- Suits owners and small teams willing to review output
- Suits varied drafting and repeat admin tasks
- Does not suit tasks where output will be accepted without checking
- Does not replace professional advice or human judgement
Pricing, alternatives and my verdict
There is a free option and paid plans. Plan details can change, so I would check the supplier's current information before deciding. Claude is an alternative I considered.
My view is that ChatGPT is most useful as a thinking and drafting partner. The gain is in structure and momentum, not in treating unedited AI output as finished work.